untitled
NEW! Upgrade to Pro Hosting and receive Ad-Free Webtools + More!
Free Message Forum from Bravenet.com Free Message Forums from Bravenet.com


Stem Cell Treatments Help Local Ohio Valley Man Walk Again
Free Guestbook from Bravenet.com Free Guestbook from Bravenet.com


So many exciting things are happening over the Stem Cell Development! Senator Frist has changed his mind and IS BACKING FUNDING! This is unbelievable! Let us know what you think!

What can you find here?

1.Locations of fa
cilities that use stem cells
2. Information on the types of stem cells
3. My personal story on how STEM CELLS have helped me walk after 19 yrs






  MSNBC.com

Frist breaks with Bush on stem cell research
Senator backs expansion of financing ‘that respects dignity of life’

The Associated Press
Updated: 7:33 p.m. ET July 29, 2005

WASHINGTON - Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist on Friday threw his support behind legislation to expand federal financing for embryonic stem cell research, breaking with President Bush and religious conservatives in a move that could impact his prospects for seeking the White House in 2008.

“It’s not just a matter of faith, it’s a matter of science,” Frist said on the floor of the Senate.

Frist, a heart-lung transplant surgeon who opposes abortion, said modifying Bush’s strict limitations on stem cell research would lead to scientific advances and “bridge the moral and ethical differences” that have made the issue politically charged.

“While human embryonic stem cell research is still at a very early stage, the limitation put into place in 2001 will, over time, slow our ability to bring potential new treatments for certain diseases,” the Tennessee lawmaker said in his speech.

“Therefore, I believe the president’s policy should be modified. We should expand federal funding ... and current guidelines governing stem cell research, carefully and thoughtfully, staying within ethical bounds,” he said.

White House reaction
At the White House, press secretary Scott McClellan said Frist had given Bush advance notice of his announcement. “The president said, ‘You’ve got to vote your conscience,”’ McClellan said.

“The president’s made his position clear,” the spokesman said when asked if Bush stands by his threat to veto a pending bill that would liberalize federal support for stem cell research. “There is a principle involved here from the president’s standpoint when it comes to issues of life,” McClellan said.

Bush and Frist appeared together at the White House shortly after Frist’s speech as the president signed a bill that allows health care professionals to report information on medical errors without fearing that it will be used against them in lawsuits.

Bush introduced him as “Doctor Bill Frist” and afterward, Bush shook Frist’s hand and said something that made the majority leader laugh. As Bush was leaving the room, he summoned Frist to join him.

The Christian Defense Coalition lambasted Frist’s change of position.

“Sen. Frist should not expect support and endorsement from the pro-life community if he votes for embryonic research funding,” it said.

“Senator Frist cannot have it both ways. He cannot be pro-life and pro-embryonic stem cell funding,” said Rev. Patrick J. Mahoney, director of the group. “Nor can he turn around and expect widespread endorsement from the pro-life community if he should decide to run for president in 2008.”

Praise from some peers
But Frist’s decision brought immediate praise from some Senate colleagues.

“It is a decision that will bring hope to millions of Americans,” said Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid of Nevada. “I know there’s still a long ways to go with the legislation, but a large step has been taken by the majority leader today ... and I admire the majority leader for doing it.”

Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., who is fighting cancer, called Frist’s talk “perhaps the most important speech made on the floor this year, and perhaps the most important speech made in many years ... It has an enormous impact.”

Said Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass.: “As a physician, Sen. Frist has a moral calling to save lives and alleviate suffering. He honors his Hippocratic Oath today by recognizing the unique healing power of embryonic stem cells.”

A bill to finance more stem cell research has passed the House, but has been stalled in the Senate. Frist’s support could push it closer to passage and set up a confrontation with Bush.

It also could impact Frist’s own political future. As a likely presidential candidate in 2008, Frist has been courting religious conservatives who helped make Bush a twice-elected president and generally consider embryonic stem cell research a moral equivalent to abortion. But the announcement, coming just a month after Frist said he did not support expanded financing “at this juncture,” could help him with centrist voters.

With those political realities in mind, Frist argued that his positions on stem cell research and abortion were not inconsistent.

‘Treat the embryo with dignity’
According to recent polls, some two-thirds of Americans say they support embryonic stem cell research and a majority of people say they would like to see fewer restrictions on taxpayer funding for those studies.

“From those cells we have the potential for looking at those diseases that everybody knows about, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s and others,” Frist said Friday.

“I give huge moral significance to the human embryo, it is nascent human life,” he said. “What that means is as we advance science, we treat that embryo with dignity, with respect.”

He credited Bush with opening the doors for federal funding of embryonic stem cell research, and said when this policy was announced in 2001, policy-makers thought 78 stem cell lines would be available. Since then, the number has dropped to 22.

“Those 22 cell lines are not of the quality for human application or human therapy, and that’s why today I believe we need to modify that policy,” Frist said.

When Bush announced his position on stem cell research, he said the government should pay only for research of stem cell colonies, or lines, that had already been created at that time, so that the “life or death” decision had already been made.

Frist said additional stem cells should be used, so long as there was a careful process of informed consent in which the parents had decided that the embryos should be discarded, not adopted or frozen.

© 2005 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

© 2005 MSNBC.com

URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8750167/

The Stem Cell Controversy

My name is Andrew Kruprzak. I started this web site due to the mass response after a Television and Newspaper interview I had done on the Stem Cell Treatment I received. I was in an automible accident almost 19 years ago. In this accident my spinal cord slammed three times like an accordian, crushing nerves. I layed in traction for almost 9 months becuase of the compression of my spine. My spinal cord was NOT severed in my accident.  It took five years after I was excepted into a research program before I even had the procedure done.The procedure was done here in the United States. I was not the only Spinal Cord Injury patient, but I was the one that they said would probably show the most promise due to the type of injury I had. They procedure consisted of 6 injections down each side of my spine concentrating mostly on the point of injury, containing my own adult stem cells taken from my spine , embryonic stem cells, and streroids.  Sadly the research group lost their funding shortly after my procedure was performed. The Doctors made us sign confidentiality forms stating that we would not divulge their names, or the facility which the treatments took place until they are ready to release their findings. My gut wrecnhed as I signed it, but I was lucky to have even been there. I wanted to be able to help other like myself, but how could I if I couldn't tell them who did this for me. It pains me becuase I know that people don't understand. After months of trying to figure out how my wife and I could help, we decided that one of the best ways to help, was to help educate people on ESC and try to help them find facilities that use embyronic stem cells. Through out our endevour we have spoken with many wise, informative, and strong willed people who are all out to do the same thing we are. They want to properly educate other on ESC, they want to get their governments to help fund the research, and a majority of them all want to walk agian.
A few weeks after my procedure  Physical Therapy for muscle retraining
and balance retraining would follow. It wasn't easy work, and at times could be very painfull. At first I said I enjoyed the sensation of pain, but only becuase I was beginning to feel it for the first time since I was 18.  I learned to walk all over again. I started with braces that went from the top of my thigh, locked at the knees, and went clear to my ankles,( KAFO's) and a walker. Now after almost a year of therepy I am able to walk with the assistance of a cane. Several Doctors had told me I would never stand, let alone walk agian.
 Everyone has their own opinion on the use of Stem Cell Treatments. This web site was designed to help others find information on the different types of stem cell treatments that are available, and to help them find the information they need. More links, and information will be added as it is found, and as often as we can. Visitors please keep an open mind while viewing this site and the information it contains. Research benefits human life. If man stopped research in areas of science, we would not have come as far as we have.

Don't Lose Hope. The Government can not ignore our voices forever.







 
Please Check out these sites and see the information they have to provided to you
These are some of the places we have found that use various forms of Stem Cell Treatments



International Spinal Cord Regeneration Center
P.O. Box 451
Bonita, California 91902

www.spinal.siteutopia.net

Medra, Inc.

22619 Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 125
Malibu, CA 90265
 
Telephone: (310) 455-5300Toll Free: (800) 386-9121Fax: (310) 455-5318Email:
medrainc@aol.com

Medical Director:William C. Rader, M.D



Proneuron Patient Recruitment Call Center
This center is currently duing a Clinical Study on SPINAL CORD INJURIES. Your Spinal Injury must have occured with in 14 days to be eligible. They are not accepting injuries that are older then that.

1-866-539-0767


Advanced Cell Therapeutics


www.stem-cells.com

www.proneuron.com
www.spinalcordtrial.com


The following web address is for an article in the UCLA NEWS

UCLA Launches $20 Million Stem Cell Institute to Investigate New Approaches to HIV, Cancer and Neurological Disorders
http://newsroom.ucla.edu/page.asp?RelNum=5977




akstemcellinfo@yahoo.com


My personal thoughts as the wife of a stem cell Patient.

Many people, including the President, are against embryonic stem cell treatments. They feel that is not right to take life in order to give life. The president would rather toss out left over embryos, instead of donating them to science. So much for your give life not take it Mr. President.
Also, People need to realize that Embryonic Stem Cells are able to grow into any of the 200 cell types in the body. They are more POTENT than Adult Stem Cells.
We urge all of you who support finding cures for cancers, neurological disorders, spinal cord injuries and more, to write to their Governors, Senators, Congressmen, and even your President, to allow FEDERAL FUNDING to support these cures.

Is the President worried that by helping this research along that many people won't have to depend on medications to help them stay alive, and the drug companies will lose massive amounts of money? Because if so, then that is just wrong.
They say that misery loves company, so maybe that’s the Presidents problem. Maybe he's miserable, and he wants others that have hopes of walking again, or not losing a loved one to Cancers, Parkinson's or Alzheimer's to be just as miserable as he is.
Way to Go Mr. President. You and your administration are helping people lose their hopes and dreams daily because of what you are calling unethical acts. I thought that letting a living, breathing  already has a heart beat and brain activity  human being live miserably, instead of providing them with a chance of normalcy agian, was unethical. But hey that's just me.
Andy has shown great strength through out this whole process. He waited five years to have Stem Cell Treatments done. All of those years were spent in a wheel chair. So to see him walk was one of the best moments in my life. 
 So my message to all of you who are reading this right now, please ask questions. So much good could come out of embryonic stem cells.  Don't just assume it is wrong because the president says so. Maybe one day when he is out of office and his health starts to decline due to many things the effect the elderly, he'll wish that he changed his mind.
Maybe if in the Presidents first administration he had passed bills allowing the use of federal funding for embryonic Stem cells, maybe, just maybe Christopher Reeve would still be here supporting the cause, and President Regan would not have developed into full blown Alzheimer's.  Maybe, just maybe.
People aren't getting the help that they need or deserve because the President and his adminstration.
But like I said, this is only my opinion.
Please feel free to tell us how you feel, we won't hold it agianst you.
God Bless
Jamilynn Kruprzak

TO FIND YOUR SENATORS GO TO:
www.senate.gov
then click on senators



                                                                                                                                              

                   
       
www.wikipedia.com

Stem cell

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

.[ lab photos]Stem cells are self-replenishing cells which have the unique potential to develop into any kind of cell, and act as a repair system for the body. They can theoretically divide without limit to replenish other cells as long as the organism is alive. Medical researchers believe stem cells have the potential to change the face of human disease by being used to repair specific tissues or to grow organs.

The study of stem cells began from research at the Ontario Cancer Institute during the 1960s by Canadian scientists Ernest A. McCulloch and James E. Till.

Contents

[hide]

Types

There are three types of stem cells:

  • A single totipotent stem cell can grow into an entire organism and even produce extra-embryonic tissues. Blastomeres have this property.
  • Pluripotent stem cells cannot grow into a whole organism, but they are able to differentiate into cells derived from any of the three germ layers.
  • Multipotent (also called unipotent) stem cells can only become some types of cells: e.g. blood cells, or bone cells.

Stem cells are also categorized according to their source, as either adult or embryonic.

Adult stem cells are undifferentiated cells found among differentiated cells of a specific tissue and are mostly multipotent cells. They are already being used in treatments for over one hundred diseases and conditions. They are more accurately called somatic (Greek σωμα sōma = body) stem cells, because they need not come from adults but can also come from children or umbilical cords.
Embryonic stem cells are cultured cells obtained from the inner mass cells of a blastocyst, an early stage embryo that is 50-150 cells. Embryonic stem cell research is "thought to have much greater developmental potential than adult stem cells," according to the National Institutes of Health.[1] However, embryonic stem cell research is still new and in the basic research phase. Research with embryonic stem cells derived from humans is controversial because, in order to start a stem cell 'line' or lineage, it requires the destruction of a blastocyst, which some people believe to be human beings. (See below: embryonic stem cell ethical debate)

Sources of stem cells


Cord blood stem cells

Blood from the placenta and umbilical cord that are left over after birth is one source of adult stem cells. Since 1988 these cord blood stem cells have been used to treat Gunther's disease, Hunter syndrome, Hurler syndrome, Acute lymphocytic leukaemia and many more problems occurring mostly in children. It is collected by removing the umbilical cord, cleansing it and withdrawing blood from the umbilical vein. This blood is then immediately analyzed for infectious agents and the tissue-type is determined. The cord blood is processed and depleted of red blood cells before being stored in liquid nitrogen for later use, at which point it is thawed, washed of the cryoprotectant, and injected through a vein of the patient. This kind of treatment, where the stem cells are collected from another donor, is called allogeneic treatment. When the cells are collected from the same patient on whom they will be used, it is called autologous and when collected from identical individuals, it is referred to as syngeneic. Xenogeneic transfer of cells between different species is very underdeveloped and is said to have little research potential.

Researchers in South Korea announced in November 2004 that they had successfully used multipotent cord blood (adult) stem cell treatments to enable a paralyzed woman to walk with the aid of a walker. This was achieved by isolating the stem cells from the umbilical cord blood and injecting the cells into the damaged part of the woman's spinal cord. Work was done by Chosun University professor Song Chang-hun, Seoul National University professor Kang Kyung-susn, and the Seoul Cord Blood Bank.[2] [3] [4] [5]


Adult stem cells

Stem cells can be found in all adult and young adult beings. Adult stem cells are undifferentiated cells that reproduce daily to provide certain specialized cells—for example 200 billion red blood cells are created each day in the body from hemopoietic stem cells. Until recently it was thought that each of these cells could produce just one particular type of cell—this is called differentiation (see Morphogenesis). However in the past few years, evidence has been gathered of stem cells that can transform into several different forms. Bone marrow stromal stem cells are known to be able to transform into liver, nerve, muscle, hair follicle and kidney cells.

Adult stem cells may be even more versatile than this. Researchers at the New York University School of Medicine have extracted stem cells from the bone-marrow of mice which they say are pluripotent. Turning one type of stem cell into another is called transdifferentiation.

In fact, useful sources of adult stem cells are being found in organs all over the body. Researchers at McGill University in Montreal have extracted stem cells from skin that are able to differentiate into many types of tissue, including neurons, smooth muscle cells and fat-cells. These were found in the dermis, the inner layer of the skin. These stem cells play a pivotal role in healing small cuts. Blood vessels, the dental pulp, the digestive epithelium, the retina, liver and even the brain are all said to contain stem cells.

The Tulane University Center for Gene Therapy is the first center federally-funded to produce and distribute well-characterized adult stem cells to researchers around the globe. These standardized cells are critical to ensuring comparability and reproducibility of the research.

Adipose derived adult stem (ADAS) cells have also been isolated from fat, e.g. from liposuction. This source of cells seems to be similar in many ways to Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) derived from bone marrow, except that it is possible to isolate many more cells from fat. These cells have been shown to differentiate into bone, fat, muscle, cartilage, and neurons. These cells have been recently used to successfully repair a large cranial defect in a human patient [6].

Olfactory adult stem cells have been successfully grown by Prof. Alan Mackay-Sim,[7] deputy director of Griffith University’s new Institute for Cellular and Molecular Therapies in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. He was awarded Queenslander of the Year in 2003 for his work. His team successfully grew adult stem cells harvested from the human nose, and was published in the journal Developmental Dynamics. The Courier-Mail cited him as follows (22 March 2005, p. 4):

Adult stem cells isolated from the olfactory mucosa (cells linking the inside of the nose involved in the sense of smell) have the ability to develop into many different cell types if they are given the right chemical environment.
These adult olfactory stem cells appear to have the same ability as embryonic stem cells in giving rise to many different cell types but have the advantage that they can be obtained from all individuals, even older people who might be most in need to stem cell therapies. ...
Adult olfactory stem cells are readily obtained from the nose and relatively easy to grow and multiply in the lab. In a few weeks we can make plenty of cells for transplantation.

An advantage of adult stem cells is that, since they can be harvested from the patient, potential ethical issues and inmunogenic rejection are averted. There are, however, at least presently, limitations to using adult stem cells. Although many different kinds of multipotent stem cells have been identified, adult stem cells that could give rise to all cell and tissue types have not yet been found. Adult stem cells are often present in only minute quantities and can therefore be difficult to isolate and purify. There is also limited evidence that they may not have the same capacity to multiply as embryonic stem cells do. Finally, adult stem cells may contain more DNA abnormalities—caused by sunlight, toxins, and errors in making more DNA copies during the course of a lifetime. However, there are a number of clinically proven adult stem cell successes.


Embryonic stem cells

Stem cells which derived from the inner mass cells of a blastocyst (an early stage embryo consisting of 50-150 cells) have pluripotent properties—they are able to grow into any of the 200 cell types in the body. Embryonic stem cells can be obtained from a cloned blastocyst, created by fusing a denucleated egg cell with a patient's cell. The blastocyst produced is allowed to grow to the size of a few tens of cells, and stem cells are then extracted. Because they are obtained from a clone, they are genetically compatible with the patient. Aggregates of cells derived from embryonic stem cells are known as embryoid bodies.

The breakthrough in embryonic stem cell research came in November 1998 when a group led by James Thomson at the University of Wisconsin-Madison first developed a technique to isolate and grow the cells. Embryonic stem cell researchers are currently attempting to grow the cells beyond the first stages of cell development, to overcome difficulties in host rejection of implanted stem cells, and to control the multiplying of implanted embryonic stem cells, which otherwise multiply uncontrollably, producing cancer.

A major development in research came in May 2003, when researchers announced that they had successfully used embryonic stem cells to produce human egg cells. These egg cells could potentially be used in turn to produce new stem cells. If research and testing proves that artificially created egg cells could be a viable source for embryonic stem cells, they noted, then this would remove the necessity of starting a new embryonic stem cell line with the destruction of a blastocyst. Thus, the controversy over donating human egg cells and blastocysts could potentially be resolved, though a blastocyst would still be required to start each cycle.

The online edition of Nature Medicine published a study on January 23, 2005 which stated that the human embryonic stem cells available for federally funded research are contaminated with nonhuman molecules from the culture medium used to grow the cells, for example, mouse cells and other animal cells. The nonhuman cell-surface sialic acid can compromise the potential uses of the embryonic stem cells in humans--according to scientists at the University of California, San Diego[8].

A study was published in the Lancet Medical Journal on May 7, 2005 that detailed information about a new stem-cell line which was derived from human embryos under completely cell- and serum-free conditions. This event is significant because exposure of existing human embryonic stem-cell lines to live animal cells and serum risks contamination with pathogens that could lead to human health risks. After more than 6 months of undifferentiated proliferation, these cells retained the potential to form derivatives of all three embryonic germ layers both in vitro and in teratomas. These properties were also successfully maintained (for more than 30 passages) with the established stem-cell lines. (Lancet Medical Journal)

Treatments


Current treatments

For over 30 years, bone marrow (adult) stem cells have been used to treat cancer patients with conditions such as leukemia and lymphoma. During chemotherapy, most growing cells are killed by the cytotoxic agents. These agents not only kill the leukemia or neoplastic cells, but also the stem cells needed to replace the killed cells as a patient recovers. However, if the stem cells are removed before chemotherapy, and then reinjected after treatment is terminated, the stem cells in the bone marrow produce large amounts of red and white blood cells, to keep the body healthy and to help fight infections.

Since the 1980s stem cells have been taken from the blood instead of the bone-marrow, making the procedure safer for older people. Although normally scarce, the number of peripheral blood cells can be increased by a course of drugs, which release the stem cells from the bone-marrow. These are removed before chemotherapy, which kills most of them, and are re-injected afterwards.

Adult stem cells have also been successfully used to treat paralysis due to spinal cord injuries, Parkinson's disease and other illnesses.


Potential treatments


Cancer

Research injecting neural (adult) stem cells into the brains of rats can be astonishingly successful in treating cancerous tumors. With traditional techniques brain cancer is almost impossible to treat because it spreads so rapidly. Researchers at the Harvard Medical School injected adult stem cells genetically engineered to convert a separately injected non-toxic substance into a cancer-killing agent. Within days the adult stem cells had migrated into the cancerous area and the injected substance was able to reduce tumor mass by 80 percent.

Spinal cord


Stem cell injection restores ability to walk

A team of Korean researchers reported on November 25, 2004, that they had transplanted multipotent adult stem cells from umbilical cord blood to a patient suffering from a spinal cord injury and she can now walk on her own, with difficulty. The patient could not even stand up for the last 19 years. The team was co-headed by researchers at Chosun University, Seoul National University and the Seoul Cord Blood Bank (SCB). For the unprecedented clinical test, the scientists isolated adult stem cells from umbilical cord blood and then injected them into the damaged part of the spinal cord.

Using stem cells, the tests were able to avoid triggering a negative bodily reaction, which are common in other transplantations, according to Hoon Han, one of the researchers. "We don’t need a strict match between cord blood stem cell type and the immune system of a patient because the latter accepts the former pretty well thanks to its immaturity," Han said. [9] [10] [11] [12] The Korean researchers have followed up on their original work. The original treatment was conducted in November 2004. On April 18, 2005, the researchers announced that they will be conducting a second treatment on the woman. [13]


Blastocyst stem cells switched to neurons

In January 2005, researchers at the University of Wisconsin-Madison differentiated human blastocyst stem cells into neural stem cells, then into the beginnings of motor neurons, and finally into spinal motor neuron cells, the cell type that, in the human body, transmits messages from the brain to the spinal cord. The newly generated motor neurons exhibited electrical activity, the signature action of neurons. Lead researcher Su-Chun Zhang described the process as "you need to teach the blastocyst stem cells to change step by step, where each step has different conditions and a strict window of time."

Transforming blastocyst stem cells into motor neurons had eluded researchers for decades. The next step will be to test if the newly generated neurons can communicate with other cells when transplanted into a living animal; the first test will be in chicken embryos. Su-Chun said their trial-and-error study helped them learn how motor neuron cells, which are key to the nervous system, develop in the first place.

The new cells could be used to treat diseases like Lou Gehrig's disease, muscular dystrophy, and spinal cord injuries.


Muscle damage

Adult stem cells are also apparently able to repair muscle damaged after heart attacks. Heart attacks are due to the coronary artery being blocked, starving tissue of oxygen and nutrients. Days after the attack is over, the cells try to remodel themselves in order to become able to pump harder. However, because of the decreased blood flow this attempt is futile and results in even more muscle cells weakening and dying. Researchers at Columbia-Presbyterian found that injecting bone-marrow stem cells, a form of adult stem cells, into mice which had had heart attacks induced resulted in an improvement of 33 percent in the functioning of the heart. The damaged tissue had regrown by 68 percent.


Human hearts repaired using patient's own stem cells

Using the patient's own bone marrow derived stem cells, Dr. Amit Patel at the University of Pittsburgh, McGowan Institute of Regenerative Medicine has shown a dramatic increase in ejection fraction for patients with congestive heart failure. Working with critically ill heart patients, researchers in Vienna have successfully used Mesenchymal stem cells to regenerate healthy new heart tissue. The adult stem cells were harvested from the patient's own bone marrow and injected into the ventricle. The heart is stopped for approximately two minutes to allow the adult stem cells to attach to the existing heart tissue. The patient is only under local anesthesia so that the surgeons can monitor how the lack of cerebral oxygen is affecting the patient. The heart is then restarted and incisions closed. The procedure is minimally invasive, as far as heart surgeries are concerned.

All of the patients that received the new treatment experienced repaired scar tissue and most had nearly complete return of proper heart function.


Neurology

In the same way that organs can be transplanted from cadavers, researchers at the Salk Institute in California have found that these could be used as a source of adult stem cells as well. Taking adult stem cells from the brains of corpses they were able to coax them into dividing into valuable neurons. However, whether they will function correctly when used in treatment has not yet been determined.


Blood supplies

For many years, researchers have hoped to develop red blood cells from stem cells. In December 2004, researchers at the University of Paris developed a way to produce large numbers of red blood cells. The three-stage process involves combining adult stem cells with another group of cells called stromal cells and then adding a growth factor to stimulate them. The study is outlined in Nature Biotechnology. The University team, lead by Professor Luc Douay, devised a technique which involves three steps:

  1. Take hematopoietic stem cells, which are known to evolve into blood cells, and treat them with a liquid to make them proliferate.
  2. Create an environment to mimic the conditions found in bone marrow by using stromal cells, which provide the structure inside bone marrow.
  3. Add a growth factor called erythropoietin, which differentiates the stem cells into red blood cells.

The stem cells can be autologous, which is the safest form of blood transfusion.


Baldness

Hair follicles also contain stem cells, and some researchers predict research on these follicle stem cells may lead to successes in treating baldness through "hair multiplication", also known as "hair cloning", within three or four years (as of November 2004). This treatment is expected to initially work through taking stem cells from existing follicles, multiplying them in cultures, and implanting the new follicles into the scalp. Later treatments may be able to simply signal follicle stem cells to give off chemical signals to nearby follicle cells which have shrunk during the aging process, which in turn respond to these signals by regenerating and once again making healthy hair. Hair Cloning Nears Reality as Baldness Cure (WebMD Nov. 2004)


Embryonic stem cell ethical debate


Blastocysts

A human blastocyst
Enlarge
A human blastocyst

A blastocyst is a stage of development of an embryo when it is around five days old and made up of about 100 cells. A blastocyst at the stage at which embryonic stem cells would be extracted is still young enough to be able to divide into two embryos, making identical twins, or in rare cases, merge with another blastocyst, even one of the opposite sex[1], to create a chimera, an individual comprised of populations of cells with two different sets of DNA. From the biological point of view, these points mean the blastocyst is not yet an individual. Blastocysts are an early developmental stage far from possessing a nervous system (or any other organs), and thus biologically speaking do not have feelings.

This view raises other issues, as the blastocysts involved in the research are left over from in vitro fertility therapy, and when not used in additional therapy or in embryonic stem cell research are destroyed or frozen indefinitely by the thousands[14]. To some, this does not address the concern that using doomed blastocysts in embryonic stem cell research is viewed as instrumentalizing a developing human being.

In the U.S., many Christian groups (such as Catholics, Eastern Orthodox and Fundamentalists) as well as other unaffiliated and non-religious groups, believe that a human blastocyst is a human being, with the according human rights, and therefore oppose embryonic stem cell research because the start of each cell line involves the destruction of a blastocyst.

Others do not view a blastocyst as a human being, and may instead see opposition of stem cell research as unfounded due to the suffering that new medical technologies could prevent. Many Jews, Muslims, Humanists, Mormons, and Unitarian Universalists, as well as a significant number of mainstream Christians are supportive of embryonic stem cell research.

Another area in embryonic stem cells that can be of ethical concern is the use of therapeutic cloning. This involves using a blastocyst cloned from the patient so that the resulting stem cells are a genetic match. Some see this as being in a category of unnaturalness shared with reproductive human cloning, in which cloned blastocysts would be allowed to grow into embryos and eventually infants. [15]


Policy debate in the U.S.


Origins of debate

In 1995, Congress passed the Dickey Amendment, prohibiting federal funding of research that involves the use of a human embryo. Privately funded research led to the breakthrough that made embryonic stem cell research possible in 1998, however, prompting the Clinton Administration to develop federal regulations for its funding. Preparations for this funding were completed in 2001. President George W. Bush announced, on August 11, 2001 that federal funds could be used to support research on the newly developed field of human embryonic stem cells, but that funding would be limited to "existing (embryonic) stem cell lines where the 'life-and-death decision' has already been made." This limitation does not apply to research involving stem cells from other sources, such as umbilical cord blood, placentas, and adult and animal tissues. Conservative religious groups felt the restrictions should have been stronger, while scientists generally felt frustrated with the restrictions.

In 2002, President Bush appointed the Council on Bioethics, an advisory group composed of 18 doctors, legal and ethical scholars, scientists and a journalist. In February 2004, Bush removed from the council two advocates of embryonic stem cell research, professor of ethics William May and biologist Elizabeth Blackburn. In their place, he appointed pediatric neurosurgeon Dr. Benjamin Carson, political scientist Dr. Diana Schaub, and professor of government Dr. Peter Lawler, all of whom have a more cautious point of view toward embryonic stem cell research. All of the Council members support adult stem cell research. Some scientists are concerned that embryonic stem cell research has become a politicized issue instead of a scientific issue in the national mindset, and feel that the politicization distorts representation of the scientific issues.


Private funding

The Bush administration's decision does not prohibit private embryonic stem cell research. Pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology companies initially expressed little interest because they consider therapies based on cells, which might have to be tailored to each patient, to be less profitable than one-size-fits-all drugs. However, there are start-up biotechs entering the field. They include StemCells Inc. and Aastrom Biosciences. Others are reluctant to enter the market because they fear government restrictions preventing them from capitalizing on the research. However, private research groups (such as pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies) are now financing individual medical treatments, including all of those mentioned in this article.


Success of adult stem cells

Adult stem cells have successfully treated over 100 medical conditions including blindness [16], Krabbe's disease [17], diabetes [18], Parkinson's disease [19], acute renal failure [20], and sickle cell anemia [21]. Opponents of embryonic stem cell research have thus argued that embryonic stem cell funding restrictions in the U.S. are not significantly impeding the overall advancement of stem cell research, and that even without the ethical concerns regarding embryonic stem cells, public health funds should focus on extending adult stem cell research successes.


Congressional response

In April 2004, 206 members of Congress, including many moderate Republicans, signed a letter urging President Bush to expand federal funding of embryonic stem cell research beyond what Bush had already supported.

Bush's 2004 Democratic presidential opponent, Senator John Kerry, had promised to support an expansion of embryonic stem-cell research if elected. Kerry's running mate, Senator John Edwards, opined during the campaign that, if Kerry was elected and research funding increased, "people like Christopher Reeve will get up out of that wheelchair and walk again."[22] Medical organizations supported Kerry in the presidential race, as it is the likelyhood that embryonic stem cell cures would arrive sooner if John Kerry were elected, due to reduced funding restrictions.

On the other side, in the discussion preceding a May 2005 congressional vote to expand embryonic stem cell research, Republican Michael Burgess, R-Texas, a doctor of obstetrics, played the sound of a fetal heartbeat over the House speaker system, declaring, "This is what it's all about, folks."[23] The blastocysts used in embryonic stem cell research are far too early in development to have hearts or any other organs. (See above, Stem_cell#Blastocysts)

In May 2005, the House of Representatives voted 238-194 to loosen the limitations on embryonic stem-cell research — by allowing surplus frozen embryos from in vitro fertilization clinics to be used for stem cell research with the permission of donors — despite Bush's promise to veto the bill if passed. [24]


Polls regarding embryonic stem cell research

Embryonic stem cell research is strongly favored by voters, recent polls show. A Pew Research Center poll at the end of 2004 indicated that Americans, by a 56-32 margin, favored performing research on embryonic stem cells over protecting embryos.[25] That is up from a 43-38 margin in a 2002 poll conducted by the center.

However, a May 2005 poll commissioned by the Secretariat for Pro-Life Activities of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops found that, in their weighted sample of Americans, 52% oppose embryonic stem cell research, and 36% support it. [26]

Republican voters are divided on embryonic stem cell research, according to a survey of 800 conducted by pollster David Winston, who also conducts surveys for the Republican leadership in the House and Senate. 25% of Republicans said they wanted no government funding of the research, 33% favored the limited funding Bush offers, and 36% wanted expanded funding to cover research on leftover embryos at fertility clinics. The Winston poll was sponsored by a group of centrist Republicans, The Republican Main Street Partnership. In a follow-up question in this poll, 54% of participants said embryonic stem cell research is "more of a research issue" and 40% said it was "more of an abortion issue."[27][28][29]


Emerging U.S. state-by-state approach

California voters in November 2004 approved Proposition 71, creating a US$3 billion state taxpayer-funded institute for stem cell research, the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine. Providing $300 million a year, the institute is thought to be the world's largest single backer of research in stem cells, and is expected to substantially increase the pace of embryonic stem cell research.

Several states, in some cases wary of a national migration of biotech researchers to California [30], have shown interest in providing their own funding support of embryonic and adult stem cell research. These states include Connecticut [31], Florida, Illinois, Massachusetts [32], New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Texas [33][34], Washington, and Wisconsin.

Other states have, or have shown interest in, additional restrictions or even complete bans on embryonic stem cell research. These states include Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Virginia. (States play catch-up on stem cells, USA Today, December 2004)

Embryonic stem cell research in the U.S. is expected to mainly develop at the state level, as a result of the much larger amount of funds available there than the federal level.


Policy debate outside the U.S.

Due to the controversy surrounding embryonic stem cells, many nations around the world have passed legislation regulating research.

In the United Kingdom, the law states that a license may be issued to enable embryos to be created or used for research for the following purposes:

  1. promoting advances in the treatment of infertility,
  2. increasing knowledge about the causes of congenital disease,
  3. increasing knowledge about the causes of miscarriages,
  4. developing more effective techniques of contraception, or
  5. developing methods for detecting the presence of gene or chromosome abnormalities in embryos before implantation,
  6. increasing knowledge about the development of embryos;
  7. increasing knowledge about serious disease, or
  8. enabling any such knowledge to be applied in developing treatments for serious disease.
(Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 as amended by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Research Purposes) Regulations 2001).

As a result of the federal funding restrictions imposed by Congress in the United States, South Korea leads the U.S. in the area of embryonic stem cell research. The UK created the world's first embryonic stem cell bank in May 2004. Because other countries have moved forward with their embryonic stem cell research programs, some in the U.S. have questioned the practicality of the Congressional funding restrictions.

The nations spending the most on stem cell research [35] include the U.S., the UK, South Korea, China, Australia, Israel, Singapore, Argentina, Uruguay, and Sweden. European nations that permit stem cell research also include Switzerland [36], Finland, Greece and the Netherlands. The UK allows the creation of human embryos for stem cell procurement. Countries with regulations allowing cloning for medical research include the UK, Belgium, Singapore and Japan. Recently Brazil has approved a law allowing the use of stem cells in research.


External links


References

  1. ^  National Institutes of Health Stem Cell FAQ, April 13, 2005.
Bravenet.com  

Web Hosting · Blog · Guestbooks · Message Forums · Mailing Lists
Easiest Website Builder ever! · Build your own toolbar · Free Talking Character · Audio, Fonts, Clipart
powered by a free webtools company bravenet.com